Showing posts with label Data Independent Adquisition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Data Independent Adquisition. Show all posts
Saturday, 29 August 2015
DIA-Umpire Pipeline Using BioDocker containers.
Tuesday, 25 November 2014
HUPO-PSI Meeting 2014: Rookie’s Notes
![]() |
Standardisation: the most difficult flower to grow. |
The PSI (Proteomics Standard Initiative) 2014
Meeting was held this year in Frankfurt (13-17 of April) and I can say I’m now
part of this history. First, I will try to describe with a couple of sentences (for
sure I will fai) the incredible venue, the Schloss Reinhartshausen Kempinski. When I
saw for the first time the hotel, first thing came to my mind was those films from
the 50s. Everything was elegant, classic, sophisticated - from the decoration to
a small latch. The food was incredible and the service is first class from the
moment you set foot on the front step and throughout the whole stay.
Standardization is the process of developing
and implementing technical standards. Standardization can help to maximize
compatibility, interoperability, safety, repeatability, or quality. It can also
facilitate commoditization of formerly custom processes. In bioinformatics, the standardization of file formats, vocabulary, and
resources is a job that all of us appreciate but for several reasons nobody
wants to do. First of all, standardization in bioinformatics means that you
need to organize and merge different experimental and in-silico pipelines to have a common way to represent the
information. In proteomics for example, you can use different sample
preparation, combined with different fractionation techniques and different
mass spectrometers; and finally using different search engines and
post-processing tools. The diversity and possible combinations is needed
because allow to explore different solutions for complex problems. (Standarization
in Proteomics: From raw data to metadata files).
Etiquetas:
Bioinformatic,
computational proteomics,
Data Independent Adquisition,
data visulization,
EBI,
editors,
ms proteomics,
proteomics,
targeted proteomics
Sunday, 6 April 2014
SWATH-MS and next-generation targeted proteomics
For proteomics, two main LC-MS/MS
strategies have been used thus far. They have in
common that the sample proteins are converted by proteolysis into
peptides,
which are then separated by (capillary) liquid
chromatography. They differ in the mass spectrometric method used.
The first and most widely used strategy is known as shotgun proteomics or discovery proteomics. For this method, the MS instrument is operated in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode, where fragment ion (MS2) spectra for selected precursor ions detectable in a survey (MS1) scan are generated (Figure 1 - Discovery workflow). The resulting fragment ion spectra are then assigned to their corresponding peptide sequences by sequence database searching (See Open source libraries and frameworks for mass spectrometry based proteomics: A developer's perspective).
The second main strategy is referred to as targeted proteomics. There, the MS instrument is operated in selected reaction monitoring (SRM) (also called multiple reaction monitoring) mode (Figure 1 - Targeted Workflow). With this method, a sample is queried for the presence and quantity of a limited set of peptides that have to be specified prior to data acquisition. SRM does not require the explicit detection of the targeted precursors but proceeds by the acquisition, sequentially across the LC retention time domain, of predefined pairs of precursor and product ion masses, called transitions, several of which constitute a definitive assay for the detection of a peptide in a complex sample (See Targeted proteomics) .
The first and most widely used strategy is known as shotgun proteomics or discovery proteomics. For this method, the MS instrument is operated in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode, where fragment ion (MS2) spectra for selected precursor ions detectable in a survey (MS1) scan are generated (Figure 1 - Discovery workflow). The resulting fragment ion spectra are then assigned to their corresponding peptide sequences by sequence database searching (See Open source libraries and frameworks for mass spectrometry based proteomics: A developer's perspective).
The second main strategy is referred to as targeted proteomics. There, the MS instrument is operated in selected reaction monitoring (SRM) (also called multiple reaction monitoring) mode (Figure 1 - Targeted Workflow). With this method, a sample is queried for the presence and quantity of a limited set of peptides that have to be specified prior to data acquisition. SRM does not require the explicit detection of the targeted precursors but proceeds by the acquisition, sequentially across the LC retention time domain, of predefined pairs of precursor and product ion masses, called transitions, several of which constitute a definitive assay for the detection of a peptide in a complex sample (See Targeted proteomics) .
Etiquetas:
Aebersold,
computational proteomics,
Data Independent Adquisition,
manuscripts,
mass spectrometers,
mass spectrometry,
proteomics,
quantitation,
sample preparation,
SWATH,
targeted proteomics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)